I really need to make the effort at reblogging other awesome articles I find elsewhere more often. This seems like a good one to start with, addressing how grief is explored in the show Steven Universe.
Lady Geek Girl and Friends
I’m not necessarily the best at taking my own advice. So when I said more than a year ago that everyone should be watching Steven Universe, I had intended to follow suit. With the exception of an episode here and there, I unfortunately didn’t get around to watching. In a way, I’m glad for it—I’d much rather marathon a show than wait for weekly updates. With the announcement of Cartoon Network renewing the show for another two seasons, though, dreams of watching it all at once (in the near future) were all but dashed, and I finally sat down to watch the entire series alongside my brother.
Me after catching up.
We’ve discussed a couple of Steven Universe‘s elements before, all in glowing terms. Today will be no different. As much as I want to gush over Pearl’s unmistakable queerness when it comes to her relationship with…
View original post 1,364 more words
Is it possible that Equestrian society is too forgiving of crimes? Or maybe the situation is that Equestrian society simply views justice differently? In this article I explore the question of what kind of justice does Equestria seem to favor. Does it favor retributive justice in which criminals are punished because they deserve it? Or is it more consequential, favoring the use of rehabilitation and isolation to advance some kind of societal goal?
So several months back Nightsphere the Gnostic did a video describing how Equestrian society seems to serve as a model for virtue ethics. He used the virtue ethics system of Aristotle as his framework, but as I argued in my own article, The Equestrian Polis: My Little Pony and Aristotle’s Politics, Equestrian society does not seem to be following Aristotle’s model at all. Within these last several months I’ve been reading up more on the topic of ethics, and have decided to finally do a full response to Nightsphere the Gnostic’s video in order to answer the question: Just what is the good life in Equestria?
I would suggest, then, that before moving on you watch Nighsphere’s video and reading my article to get the full discussion.
I’ll be answering the question posed in two parts. In Part I I will return to the model presented by Aristotle in order to see if it can be salvaged from my initial disliking. While I honestly still believe it fails, attempting a defense of it may enlighten us as to what exactly the answer to our question is. In Part II I will offer another philosopher’s view on the subject that, I argue, is much more accurate as to what the good life in Equestria is.
While Nightosphere already made quite the argument that Friendship is Magic can be interpreted as a representation of virtue ethics in action, I question his statement that it is can utopia in-visioned by Aristotle. Digging into virtue ethics and Aristotle’s views on citizenship and the polis, I argue that Equestria instead presents a powerful, more egalitarian alternative to Aristotle’s political system.
Is it possible that Princess Celestia and the other alicorns are living a life in the “transcendence” stage of Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs? In this article I’ll be taking a look at how humanistic psychology can be used to explore Celestia’s motivations and the nature of alicornhood.
Yet another wonderful video by Nightsphere the Gnostic, with me being referenced *squee*….and now the bar is set rather high for me since I wanted to do an article on this *not squee*.
And my inner utilitarian wants to argue he’s wrong, but I have to concede that viewing Friendship is Magic through an Aristotelian viewpoint works really, really well.